|
Table of Contents |
|
Statin Adjunct Therapy - Zetia, Revenue Protection for Zocor? - Analysis of the role of adjunctive therapy in the treatment of dyslipidemia, focusing on the factors driving versus limiting the future uptake of Zetia (ezetimibe)
Product Code: BFHC0587
Publication Date: 26-May-2003
Overview
Introduction
Statins are undisputedly the gold standard in the treatment of dyslipidemia and more efficacious monotherapies are unlikely to be identified and developed in the near future. However, an important unmet need lies in the effective control of patients with complicated lipid profiles. Therefore, agents that can be used as adjuncts to statin therapy are being increasingly prescribed.
Scope
· Assess the market potential for non-statin anti-dyslipidemics offering a novel mechanism of action or additional benefits to statin monotherapy
· Examine the potential of Zetia as an adjunct to statin therapy by assessing its benefits over existing adjunctive therapies
· Understand existing constraints which may limit the uptake of Zetia and potential threats to the long-term success of the drug
Report Highlights
With statins unable to adequately control cholesterol in all patients, there remains a strong need for novel therapies that enhance the benefits of statins. In turn, Zetia is being firmly positioned as an adjunct to statin therapy, with the ability to enhance the LDL cholesterol lowering efficacy of these agents by 25%.
The combined use of a statin and Zetia as separate pills will have a negative impact on compliance and will increase the cost of lipid lowering therapy. However, the availability of a single pill combination of Zocor and Zetia may address certain of these issues.
The future sales potential of Zetia and its single pill formulation with Zocor may be threatened by third generation statins and developmental compounds with novel mechanisms of action that offer superior potency over marketed anti-dyslipidemics or have anti-atherosclerotic and anti-inflammatory benefits.
Table of Contents
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
4 |
|
Introduction |
4 |
|
Scope and coverage of the Brief |
5 |
|
Key findings about adjunctive therapies in the market for anti-dyslipidemics |
5 |
|
PATIENT POTENTIAL |
7 |
|
Definition of dyslipidemia |
7 |
|
Segmentation of dyslipidemia |
7 |
|
Markers for dyslipidemia |
7 |
|
Which markers are the best indicators of cardiovascular risk? |
8 |
|
Low HDL cholesterol: a strong predictor, independent of LDL cholesterol |
8 |
|
BARI trial: importance of non-HDL cholesterol |
9 |
|
Apolipoprotein B: a better measure of risk than LDL cholesterol? |
9 |
|
Epidemiology of dyslipidemia |
10 |
|
Prevalence of hypercholesterolemia |
10 |
|
Little change in cholesterol among US adults in 1999–2000 |
12 |
|
Prevalence of low HDL cholesterol in the UK |
12 |
|
UPTAKE OF ADJUNCTIVE THERAPIES |
14 |
|
Niaspan (niacin) |
14 |
|
Overview |
14 |
|
Clinical trial data |
15 |
|
Commercial potential |
15 |
|
Advicor (niacin/lovastatin) |
18 |
|
Overview |
18 |
|
Clinical trial data |
18 |
|
Commercial potential |
20 |
|
WelChol (colesevelam) |
22 |
|
Overview |
22 |
|
Clinical trial data |
23 |
|
Commercial potential |
25 |
|
THE POTENTIAL FOR ZETIA |
28 |
|
Zetia (ezetimibe) |
28 |
|
Drug overview |
28 |
|
Clinical trial data |
29 |
|
Ezetimibe as a monotherapy |
29 |
|
Ezetimibe in combination with statin therapy |
30 |
|
FACTORS DETERMINING THE ROLE OF ZETIA |
34 |
|
Factors driving uptake of Zetia |
34 |
|
Safety concerns over high dose statin therapy |
34 |
|
Efficacy in difficult-to-treat patients |
36 |
|
Zetia’s novel mechanism of action |
38 |
|
Increased patient compliance with the single pill combination therapy |
39 |
|
Strong marketing support from Merck & Co. to prescribe Zetia in combination with Zocor |
40 |
|
Factors limiting uptake of Zetia |
41 |
|
Many patients are adequately controlled on statin monotherapy |
41 |
|
Widespread availability of cheap, generic statins |
42 |
|
The launch of more potent third-generation statins |
43 |
|
Increased cost associated with add-on therapy |
44 |
|
Increased pill burden with the addition of adjunctive therapy |
46 |
|
Inability to individually titrate doses in single pill combinations |
46 |
|
Development of novel adjunctive therapies that have additional anti-atherosclerotic benefits |
47 |
|
Vascular protectants |
47 |
|
CETP inhibitors |
48 |
|
MTP inhibitors |
48 |
|
CONCLUSION |
49 |
|
APPENDIX |
51 |
|
Bibliography |
51 |
|
Clinical trial data |
51 |
|
Physician transcripts |
52 |
|
DISCLAIMER |
56 |
|
List of Tables |
|
|
Table 1: Prevalence of hypercholesterolemia in the seven major markets (000s), 2002–10 |
11 |
|
Table 2: Estimated prevalence of low HDL cholesterol (<40mg/dL) in the UK, 2003 |
13 |
|
Table 3: Cost comparison of Advicor single-pill combination versus Niaspan and generic lovastatin components |
21 |
|
Table 4: Efficacy of WelChol as a monotherapy and in combination in reducing LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels, and in increasing HDL cholesterol |
24 |
|
Table 5: Clinical trial results for the use of Zetia as a monotherapy |
29 |
|
Table 6: Clinical trial results obtained when adding ezetimibe to ongoing statin therapy in patients who had not met LDL cholesterol targets |
31 |
|
Table 7: Clinical trial results obtained with the concurrent initiation of ezetimibe and statin therapy |
32 |
|
Table 8: Comparison of Niaspan, Advicor and WelChol |
33 |
|
Table 9: Factors that may drive of limit the uptake and potential of Zetia |
34 |
|
Table 10: Number of fatal cases of rhabdomyolysis linked to statin usage in the US in 2001 |
35 |
|
Table 11: Key changes to lipid levels between the NCEP II and NCEP III |
38 |
|
Table 12: Phase III trial results comparing rosuvastatin with atorvastatin |
43 |
|
Table 13: Costs of statin monotherapy compared to Zetia/statin combination therapy |
45 |
|
Table 14: Forecast sales of Zetia ($m), 2003–08 |
50 |
|
List of Figures |
|
|
Figure 1: Key factors in the market dynamics of Niaspan |
17 |
|
Figure 2: Advicor: SWOT analysis |
22 |
|
Figure 3: Key factors in the market dynamics of WelChol |
27 |