|
Table of Contents |
|
Stakeholder Opinions: Skin Infections - Where In The Antibacterial Lifecycle? - An overview of the community management of skin infections across the seven major markets, including disease definitions, class overviews and analysis of recent market events
Product Code: dmhc2002
Publication Date: 09-Jun-2004
Overview
Introduction
Bacterial skin and skin structure infections are among the most common infections treated within the community setting. There are a wide range of different types of infection, each with individual symptoms, epidemiology and etiology. However, the majority require antibacterial treatment and, as a result, represent potential lucrative targets for novel product development and indication expansion.
Scope
· Disease definitions, symptoms, epidemiology and risk factors for key skin and skin structure infections
· Detailed seven country market analysis by class and indication, including volume and value assessments
· Breakdown of prescriptions for key skin infections by physician type, across the seven major markets
· Strategic analysis and recommendations for maximizing the potential of the skin infections sector
Report Highlights
Prescriptions associated with skin infections account for only a small percentage of total community antibacterial sales (e.g. 3% of US drugstore sales). Companies developing and marketing broad-spectrum antibacterials should consider skin infections as a secondary target, focusing primary resources on higher value indications.
High unmet need in the management of skin infections involving resistant pathogens increases the likelihood of gaining fast-track designation in the US. The potential for rapid market entry, reduced development costs and focused physician targets presents an attractive proposition for smaller players with limited resources.
There is a clear lack of synergy between acne and other bacterial infections, in terms of prescribing physicians and focus classes. Companies involved in antibacterial product development or life-cycle management should bear this in mind when considering indication expansions.
Reasons to Purchase
· Effectively prioritize skin infections within your antibacterial portfolio with detailed prescription and sales data
· Target detailing campaigns more effectively with in-depth understanding of physicians involved in the management of skin infections
· Identify key strategies to maximize the potential of bacterial skin infections for both key players and new market entrants
|
CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
3 |
|
Scope of the analysis |
3 |
|
Datamonitor insight into the skin infection market |
4 |
|
While skin infections represent one of the most common types of bacterial infection, prescriptions associated with these conditions only account for a relatively limited percentage of total community antibacterial sales (e.g. 3% of US drugstore sales in 2003 attributable to skin infections.) Companies developing and marketing broad-spectrum antibacterials should consider skin infections as a secondary target, focusing resources on higher value indications, such as respiratory tract infections. |
4 |
|
High unmet need in the management of skin infections involving resistant pathogens increases the likelihood of gaining fast-track designation in the US, as demonstrated by Cubist's Cubicin (daptomycin) and Basilea's novel cephalosporin, BAL5788. The potential for rapid market entry, reduced development costs and focused physician targets presents an attractive proposition for smaller players with limited resources. |
5 |
|
While the management of acne generates almost $200m per year in antibacterial sales, differences in physician involvement in the management of this condition, relative to other bacterial infections, limit the potential of indication expansion into this area. Across the seven major markets, the majority of acne patients are treated by dermatologists (73% of acne antibacterial sales - IMS Health, Prescribing Insights, April 2004), whereas other bacterial infections are managed predominantly by GPs, family practitioners and pediatricians. Companies should consider the clear lack of synergy between acne and other bacterial infections when evaluating product development and life-cycle management options. |
7 |
|
Summary |
9 |
|
Key metrics |
10 |
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
13 |
|
CHAPTER 2 DISEASE DEFINITION AND EPIDEMIOLOGY |
19 |
|
Disease definition |
19 |
|
Furunculosis |
20 |
|
Folliculitis |
21 |
|
Impetigo |
23 |
|
Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome |
23 |
|
Cellulitis |
24 |
|
Erysipelas |
27 |
|
Necrotising fasciitis |
28 |
|
Myositis |
29 |
|
Acne |
30 |
|
Staphylococcus aureus - the most common cause |
31 |
|
Staphylococcus aureus toxins |
31 |
|
Staphylococcus aureus resistance in skin infections |
31 |
|
CHAPTER 3 PRESENTATION, DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT |
34 |
|
Presentation |
34 |
|
Initial presentation and care |
34 |
|
Referral patterns |
35 |
|
Case study: United Kingdom |
36 |
|
Hospital vs. community management |
37 |
|
Reasons for hospital admission |
38 |
|
Diagnosis |
39 |
|
CHAPTER 4 MARKET ANALYSIS BY DRUG CLASS |
40 |
|
Market definition |
40 |
|
Diagnoses included in the analysis |
40 |
|
The importance of skin infections |
41 |
|
Penicillins |
44 |
|
Macrolides |
48 |
|
Cephalosporins |
53 |
|
Fluoroquinolones |
56 |
|
Zyvox |
60 |
|
CHAPTER 5 MARKET ANALYSIS BY INDICATION |
64 |
|
Impetigo |
64 |
|
Therapeutic choice |
64 |
|
Treating physicians |
66 |
|
Analyst comment |
68 |
|
Cellulitis |
68 |
|
Therapeutic choice |
69 |
|
Treating physicians |
72 |
|
Analyst comment |
73 |
|
Acne |
74 |
|
Therapeutic choice |
76 |
|
Treating physicians |
77 |
|
Analyst comment |
80 |
|
CHAPTER 6 STRATEGIC ANALYSIS |
82 |
|
Community prescriptions - hard to influence? |
82 |
|
Large target audience? |
82 |
|
Geographical dispersion of target audience |
83 |
|
Increasing involvement and variability of stakeholders |
84 |
|
Increasing competition necessitates greater differentiation |
85 |
|
SSTIs - line-extension or quick route in? |
85 |
|
Indication expansion |
85 |
|
Skin infections - route of entry for smaller players? |
87 |
|
Supporting data |
90 |
|
Opinion leader transcripts |
91 |
|
List of tables |
124 |
|
List of figures |
124 |
|
Bibliography |
125 |
|
Report methodology |
129 |
|
About Datamonitor |
130 |
|
About Datamonitor Healthcare |
130 |
|
Datamonitor Healthcare's research and analysis methodologies |
131 |
|
Datamonitor Healthcare's therapy area capabilities |
131 |
|
About the infectious disease analysis team |
132 |
|
Datamonitor Healthcare's Consulting expertise |
133 |
|
Key therapy team members |
134 |
|
Disclaimer |
136 |
|
List of Tables |
|
|
Table 1: Reported bacterial infections in the seven major markets |
10 |
|
Table 2: Relative costs of SSTI prescriptions for penicillins in Italy and Spain, 2003 |
47 |
|
Table 3: Relative costs per SSTI prescription of macrolides in France and Italy, 2003 |
51 |
|
Table 4: Relative costs of cephalosporin prescriptions for SSTIs in France and Italy, 2003 |
55 |
|
Table 5: Antibacterial prescriptions for Impetigo attributable to individual classes across the EU, 2003 |
65 |
|
Table 6: Clinical costs of Cubist's VRE comparative study, 2002 |
88 |
|
List of Figures |
|
|
Figure 1: Niche products or line extensions - where do skin infections fit into the antibacterial life-cycle? |
9 |
|
Figure 2: Antibacterial prescriptions and value for skin and soft tissue infections in the community in Italy and France, 2003 |
11 |
|
Figure 3: Community cellulitis prescriptions by class, Japan, US and Spain (2003) |
12 |
|
Figure 4: Simplistic classification of skin and soft tissue infections |
19 |
|
Figure 5: Antibacterial prescriptions and value for skin and soft tissue infections in the community in Italy and France, 2003 |
35 |
|
Figure 6: Contribution of skin infections to total antibacterial sales and prescriptions in the community in Italy by quarter, 2001-2003 |
41 |
|
Figure 7: Contribution of skin infections to total antibacterial sales and prescriptions in the community in France by quarter, 2001-2003 |
42 |
|
Figure 8: Quarterly diagnostic value of skin infections in the community in France by class, 2001-2003 |
43 |
|
Figure 9: Penicillin use in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections in the community inFrance, 2001-2003 |
45 |
|
Figure 10: Penicillin use in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections in the community in Italy, 2001-2003 |
46 |
|
Figure 11: Contribution of SSTIs to penicillin value in the community in France and Italy, 2001-2003 |
48 |
|
Figure 12: Macrolide use in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections in the community in France, 2001-2003 |
49 |
|
Figure 13: Macrolide use in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections in Italy, 2001-2003 |
50 |
|
Figure 14: Contribution of SSTIs to macrolide value in the community in France and Italy, 2001-2003 |
52 |
|
Figure 15: Cephalosporin use in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections in the community in France, 2001-2003 |
53 |
|
Figure 16: Cephalosporin use in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections in the community in Italy, 2001-2003 |
54 |
|
Figure 17: Contribution of SSTIs to cephalosporin value in France and Italy community sectors, 2001-2003 |
56 |
|
Figure 18: Fluoroquinolone use in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections in the community in France, 2001-2003 |
57 |
|
Figure 19: Fluoroquinolone use in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections in the community in Italy, 2001-2003 |
58 |
|
Figure 20: Contribution of SSTIs to fluoroquinolone value in France and Italy community settings, 2001-2003 |
59 |
|
Figure 21: Contribution of skin infections to quarterly US drug store sales of Zyvox, 2001-2003 |
61 |
|
Figure 22: Zyvox prescriptions and diagnostic value by type of skin infection, US drug stores (2001-2003) |
62 |
|
Figure 23: Zyvox prescriptions by physician type, US drug stores (2001-2003) |
63 |
|
Figure 24: Proportion of antibacterial prescriptions for Impetigo attributable to individual classes across the EU community sectors, 2003 |
65 |
|
Figure 25: Antibacterial prescriptions for Impetigo attributable to the leading five individual molecules across the EU community sectors, 2003 |
66 |
|
Figure 26: Antibacterial prescriptions for impetigo by physician type in the community, Japan, US and Spain (2003) |
67 |
|
Figure 27: Cellulitis prescriptions by class in the community, Japan, US and Spain (2003) |
70 |
|
Figure 28: Cellulitis therapy by class, US drug stores 2003 |
71 |
|
Figure 29: Cellulitis prescriptions by physician type in the community in Japan, the US and Spain, 2003 |
72 |
|
Figure 30: Cellulitis prescriptions by physician type in the community, Spain 2003 |
73 |
|
Figure 31: Value of community prescriptions for the treatment of acne across the seven major markets, community sector 2003 ($m) |
74 |
|
Figure 32: Value of community antibacterial prescriptions for the treatment of acne across the seven major market, community sector 2003 ($m) |
75 |
|
Figure 33: Antibacterial contribution to overall community acne diagnostic value in the community, 7 major markets 2003 ($m) |
76 |
|
Figure 34: Value of community antibacterial prescriptions for acne across the seven major markets by class in the community, 2003 ($m) |
77 |
|
35: Physicians responsible for the community prescription of pharmaceutical therapy for acne in the community, 7 major markets (2003) |
78 |
|
Figure 36: Community antibacterial prescriptions in the US by physicians type and drug class in the community, 2003 |
79 |
|
Figure 37: Community antibacterial prescriptions in Spain by physicians type and drug class in the community, 2003 |
80 |
|
Figure 38: Key indication expansions for Levaquin and Cipro in the US, 1998-2002 |
86 |
|
Figure 39: Contribution of SSTIs to total antibacterial diagnostic value, US drugstores and Spain retail (2003) |
90 |
|
Figure 40: Datamonitor's Healthcare Consultancy |
133 |
|
Figure 41: Datamonitor Healthcare's Therapeutic Consulting capabilities |
134 |