|
Table of Contents |
|
IP Channel Strategies - Detailed assessment of IP trends, vendors and channel strategies with market sizing from 2005-8 for Western Europe, by country & vertical market.
Product Code: dmtc1155
Publication Date: 15-Jul-2005
Overview
Introduction
IP represents a substantial opportunity not only for IP vendors, but also for their broader ecosystems including: service providers (SPs), value-added resellers (VARs), systems integrators (SIs), independent software vendors (ISVs) and networking vendors. It is these broader ecosystems that will help end-users realize IP's true value.
Scope
· Explores IP vendors' partner ecosystems and how these support systems can provide differentiation in what is a relatively commoditized space.
· Offers comprehensive strategic assessments of major vendors and market sizing through 2008.
Report Highlights
As Western European IP solution revenues grow from $1.98bn in 2005 growing to just under $2.6bn by 2008, horizontal & vertical applications will play an increasingly significant role in boosting uptake. Mobility, security & contact center applications will all play a big role. As will vertical applications around FS, public sector & manufacturing.
•IP solution revenues will account for $1.98bn in 2005 growing to just under $2.6bn by 2008, in Western Europe.
alhfdhks
Reasons to Purchase
· Detailed assessments of IP vendors' strategies, exploring their ecosystem mix between SIs, VARs, SPs, ISVs and data networking firms.
· European IP market trends and sizing by country and vertical market to 2008.
|
CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
3 |
|
Introduction |
3 |
|
Market context |
3 |
|
Competitive dynamics |
5 |
|
CHAPTER 2 INTRODUCTION |
14 |
|
What is this report about? |
14 |
|
Who is the target reader? |
14 |
|
How to use this report |
15 |
|
CHAPTER 3 MARKET CONTEXT |
16 |
|
Introduction |
16 |
|
Key findings |
16 |
|
Migrating to IP-PBX telephony |
17 |
|
The migration benefits whole new partner ecosystems |
18 |
|
Incumbents will have a short-term advantage |
18 |
|
Technology definitions - the changing face of network protocols |
18 |
|
Three distinct VoIP deployments |
19 |
|
Telephony systems in the enterprise |
19 |
|
Traditional PBX systems |
20 |
|
Pure IP and IP-enabled solutions |
20 |
|
IP-PBXs |
20 |
|
IP-enabled PBXs |
21 |
|
Which protocol will win? SIP vs H.323 |
22 |
|
H.323 will fade |
22 |
|
SIP is gaining traction |
22 |
|
IP phones |
22 |
|
Dual mode handsets are a substantial opportunity |
23 |
|
Softphones |
23 |
|
PBXs will continue to be phased out |
24 |
|
...And IP will continue to take PBXs' place |
25 |
|
From trial to full implementation |
25 |
|
But IP still has its impediments... |
26 |
|
Why vertical focus will be a key differentiator in the IP game |
30 |
|
Appropriate partnerships help vendors to tailor solutions for greater value |
31 |
|
Relative degree of vertical focus: Cisco leads |
33 |
|
How fast is the change to IP happening? |
34 |
|
The US continues to outpace Europe |
34 |
|
A gradual shift from PBX to IP |
35 |
|
The UK leads in IP uptake followed by Germany |
36 |
|
IP-enabled PBX revenues still dominant across Europe |
37 |
|
Manufacturing, financial services & retail will be key targets |
38 |
|
Financial services |
39 |
|
Retail banking |
39 |
|
The trading floor |
40 |
|
Public sector |
40 |
|
Local government |
40 |
|
Healthcare |
40 |
|
Manufacturing |
41 |
|
Retail and wholesale |
42 |
|
CONCLUSION |
42 |
|
CHAPTER 4 COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS |
44 |
|
Introduction |
44 |
|
Key findings |
44 |
|
Competitor identification |
45 |
|
The "traditional" contenders from voice and data |
45 |
|
Traditional PBX manufacturers |
46 |
|
New-wave IP LAN manufacturers |
46 |
|
Co-opetition from new quarters |
46 |
|
How the enlarged IP ecosystem is taking shape |
47 |
|
SIs and VARs: partnerships vary by geography and customer size |
50 |
|
Service providers: unsurprisingly incumbents favor their own |
52 |
|
Application partners: a mixed bag |
53 |
|
Open standards enable truly multimedia applications |
54 |
|
ISV relationships help to provide greater competitive differentiation |
55 |
|
ISV programs are becoming more centralized, but maintain local flexibility |
55 |
|
ISV partners of all sizes play an essential role in IP ecosystems |
56 |
|
ISV incentivization programs vary |
57 |
|
CRM, call recording and unified messaging |
58 |
|
Mobility |
58 |
|
Storage |
59 |
|
Security |
59 |
|
Platforms & databases |
60 |
|
IP vendors align with Microsoft, IBM and others |
60 |
|
Platform support decisions grow in significance |
61 |
|
Microsoft leads in terms of total # of ISV relationships |
61 |
|
Networking vendors: a key component in TEMs' strategies |
61 |
|
Siemens is most closely tied to networking companies |
62 |
|
Avaya also has close networking relationships |
62 |
|
"Other" vendors: a hodgepodge of partners to spice up the mix |
63 |
|
Exploring individual IP vendors' strategies |
63 |
|
Alcatel |
64 |
|
Avaya |
66 |
|
Cisco |
68 |
|
Nortel |
71 |
|
Siemens |
73 |
|
Conclusions |
76 |
|
CHAPTER 5 OPINION |
78 |
|
Introduction |
78 |
|
Key findings |
78 |
|
Size matters: channel strategies will become more granular |
79 |
|
SOHO (1-9 employees) and SMB (10-49 employees) |
80 |
|
Who are they? |
80 |
|
How do they buy? |
80 |
|
What are the challenges going forward for targeting them? |
80 |
|
SME 1 (50-249 employees) and low to mid SME 2 (250-499 employees in the band, but likely up to 400 in this segment) |
81 |
|
Who are they? |
81 |
|
How do they buy? |
81 |
|
What are the challenges going forward for targeting them? |
82 |
|
Upper SME 2 (250-499 employees in the band, but likely to be 400+ in this segment) and enterprise (500+ employees) |
82 |
|
Who are they? |
82 |
|
How do they buy? |
83 |
|
What are the challenges going forward for targeting them? |
83 |
|
Implications of increased granularity |
83 |
|
Channel incentivization will become more fragmented |
84 |
|
Implications of fragmented incentivization |
86 |
|
The ecosystem is dead. Long live the ecosystem. |
86 |
|
Implications of the changing ecosystem |
87 |
|
"Frenemies": can SPs and SIs/ITOs get along? |
87 |
|
Implications of reduced SI/ITO and SP friction |
88 |
|
Conclusion: channel divergence is rife and essential |
88 |
|
CHAPTER 6 APPENDIX |
89 |
|
Definitions |
89 |
|
Research methodology |
91 |
|
Further readings |
92 |
|
SPP writing team |
92 |
|
How to contact experts in your industry |
93 |
|
List of Tables |
|
|
Table 1: Telephony revenues in Western Europe, 2005 - 2008 ($m) |
36 |
|
Table 2: Telephony revenues in Western Europe, by country, 2005 - 2008 ($m) |
37 |
|
Table 3: IP telephony revenues by industry in Western Europe, 2005-2008 ($m) |
39 |
|
List of Figures |
|
|
Figure 1: Increasingly fragmented channel incentivization |
6 |
|
Figure 2: Typical IP-PBX network architecture |
21 |
|
Figure 3: Business and technological drivers of IP |
25 |
|
Figure 4: ROI scenarios for various types of IP deployments |
29 |
|
Figure 5: Geographic variations in IP uptake: public sector |
31 |
|
Figure 6: Selected leading FS ISVs across all applications |
32 |
|
Figure 7: Selected leading government ISVs across all applications |
32 |
|
Figure 8: Selected leading manufacturing ISVs across all applications |
33 |
|
Figure 9: Relative degree of vertical focus assessment |
34 |
|
Figure 10: Telephony revenues in Western Europe, 2005 - 2008 ($m) |
35 |
|
Figure 11: IP telephony revenues by country in Western Europe, 2005 |
37 |
|
Figure 12: IP telephony revenues by industry in Western Europe, 2005 |
38 |
|
Figure 13: Sources of competition in the IP competitive landscape |
48 |
|
Figure 14: How the major players interact within the IP ecosystem |
49 |
|
Figure 15: SI and VAR IP partner ecosystem |
51 |
|
Figure 16: Service provider partner ecosystem |
53 |
|
Figure 17: Business benefits increase over time with IP |
55 |
|
Figure 18: Application partner ecosystem |
57 |
|
Figure 19: Networking vendor partner ecosystem |
62 |
|
Figure 20: Other vendor partner ecosystem |
63 |
|
Figure 21: Alcatel's IP partner ecosystem |
65 |
|
Figure 22: Alcatel's channel mix |
66 |
|
Figure 23: Avaya's IP partner ecosystem |
67 |
|
Figure 24: Avaya's channel mix |
68 |
|
Figure 25: Cisco's IP partner ecosystem |
69 |
|
Figure 26: Cisco's channel mix |
70 |
|
Figure 27: Nortel's IP partner ecosystem |
71 |
|
Figure 28: Nortel's channel mix |
72 |
|
Figure 29: Siemens' IP partner ecosystem |
74 |
|
Figure 30: Siemens' channel mix |
75 |
|
Figure 31: Vendors' comparative channel mix |
76 |
|
Figure 32: Size segmentation granularity will increase; particularly in the mid-market |
79 |
|
Figure 33: Increasingly fragmented channel incentivization |
85 |
|
Figure 34: Datamonitor's market expertise and research and analysis methodology |
91 |